A Childish Theory by
Charley Reese
As of this writing,
more than 1,800 young Americans have died in Iraq. The combined cost of
the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is $340 billion.
This is what happens when we elect people who refuse to accept the
limits set by the United States Constitution.
The Constitution gave us a government to govern America, not the world.
It is none of our business what forms of government other countries
have, just as it is none of our business whether the women in a foreign
country wear burkhas or bikinis.
Surely you realize by now that either the Bush administration knew Iraq
had no weapons of mass destruction or, even scarier, was dumb enough to
believe it did have them. On Sept. 11, 2001, we had one enemy - a
terrorist organization that calls itself al-Qaida. Instead of limiting
our response to taking out that organization, President George Bush
declared war on the world.
He bought the childishly unrealistic theory, concocted by mostly
pro-Israeli neoconservatives, that we could take out Saddam Hussein and
install a Jeffersonian democracy in Iraq, and that this fine example
would spread liberal democracy to the entire Middle East. This was
going to be cheap and easy, they said. It was not only a childish and
simplistic theory, it was stupid. It's what you would expect from a
bunch of mostly academics who have never heard the sound of gunfire and
who don't read or speak Arabic, much less have ever spent any time in
the area.
In the Iraq War we were everybody's sucker. That crook Ahmad Chalabi
played us for a sucker, and the Israelis played us for a sucker. They
both got what they wanted - the destruction of Saddam Hussein's
government without spending a dollar of their money or a drop of their
blood. Instead of Iraqi oil paying for the war, as the neocons had
promised, we are paying $61 a barrel for oil. After two years of
American occupation, the Iraqi people still don't have:
(1) security,
(2) dependable power,
(3) cheap and plentiful gasoline,
(4) clean water,
(5) a decent sewer system or
(6) a viable economy.
The deluded imperialists in Washington can blame that on the
insurgency, but I assure you, the Iraqi people blame us.
There is now more terror, not less; the Middle East is less stable, not
more stable; and we are not going to end up with a democracy in Iraq.
We're going to end up instead with a theocracy aligned with Iran, a
civil war or another authoritarian government - or the entire series of
bad outcomes, one after another. And in the meantime, our own liberty
is being diminished.
What we routinely misname a democracy (our form of government is a
republic, not a democracy) evolved through the centuries from our
mother country, the United Kingdom. It has taken hold nowhere else on
the globe except in the English-speaking countries, not even on
Continental Europe. It is uniquely English, based on English common law.
One would have to be a moron or entirely ignorant of the Muslim world
to expect that you could impose that system on Iraq at the point of a
gun. There is such a striking absence of common sense in Washington
that I sometimes think we ought to outsource the State Department to
the Teamsters Union, and intelligence work to the Mafia. It would help
if we moved the national capital to Fargo, N.D., where subzero
temperatures might encourage Congress to do its work on time.
Last week, a bunch of insurgents - probably none of whom had any formal
training - killed 14 of the "best-trained, best-equipped soldiers
in the world" with one homemade bomb. The insurgents know one
thing the hotshots in Washington overlooked: The way to fight a
high-tech army is with low-tech tactics and weapons.
As long as we keep troops in Iraq, some of them will die, because in
that part of the world, when you kill a man, you automatically incur
the mortal enmity of his family. In other words, we are manufacturing
new insurgents every time we kill one. Like the Viet Cong, the
insurgents know they can't beat us on the battlefield, but they know
that in the long run, they will be there and we won't.
