We The People
Constitutional Activism Website
For Liberty in our Lifetime!
"if
we are not part of the solution, then most assuredly,
we are part of the problem. Live free or die!"
Stanley2002.org thanks it's unique visitors.
The Patriot A List To
honor Patriots who do more than talk about standing up to those in
government that are operating outside the law or under color of law
Volunteer Today!
Rick needs your help as all of our campaigns for constitutional freedom
from government need volunteers. Email Rick Stanley at Rick@Stanley2002.org
and tell Rick how you wish to help.
When Morgan Reynolds called the official story about 9/11 bogus, it
seemed like the whole world stopped for a moment to listen.
It seemed like a lighting bolt hit the heart of the government story,
cracking it into a million unexplainable pieces.
And when the dust settled from his explosive statements, the
highest-ranking member of the Bush team to make such an accusation said
he wasn't expecting any "invitations to the White House anytime soon."
Two weeks ago, the former chief economist in the Labor Department
during President Bush's first term told the world he thought the WTC
fell from a controlled demolition, indicating 9/11 was "an inside
government job."
Reynolds, a respected economist and former Republican conservative,
made his claims after researching many aspects of 9/11, including
scientific and engineering data for and against the government story.
He presented his findings on the Internet in a long, detailed article,
concluding:
"It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate
over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers and Building 7. If
the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then
policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be
correct either.
"The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its
own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full
range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings.
"More importantly, momentous political and social consequences
would follow if impartial observers concluded that professionals
imploded the WTC. Meanwhile, the job of scientists, engineers and
impartial researchers everywhere is to get the scientific and
engineering analysis of 9/11 right."
Considering his place among the Republican faithful, once the media got
its "claws into his controversial remarks," his words quickly spread
with the help of cyberspace like an out of control wildfire.
Not only did millions read his story on the Internet, but Reynolds
controversial comments then drew instant attention from numerous
mainstream newspapers, radio and television stations, including UPI,
MSNBC, FOX News and over a dozen other major market local radio and TV
stations.
It was a story that "grew wings," a story Reynolds never expected would
get so much attention and such a large audience.
"I had a huge response and it really was amazing. I never
expected so many people to respond so passionately," said Reynolds this
week in a telephone interview. "I literally received hundreds and
hundred of emails, some agreeing with me and others, of course,
disagreeing.
"After it was all said and done, as things are starting to
finally quiet down now, I would guess it was about 5 to 1 in favor of
what I was saying. However, I never imagined how much support there was
out there for what I was suggesting occurred on 9/11."
Without mincing words, as he did in his article, Reynolds quickly
changed the subject, again placing the blame squarely on the government
for not coming clean about what happened on 9/11, saying it's important
to get to the bottom of a "story that dwarfs all others in comparison."
"What it boils down to is that the government and the mainstream media
are not digging into the 9/11 controversy because they are hiding
something," said Reynolds. "From a media point of view, it's the story
of the century and they are not even trying to connect the dots."
Continuing to throw some punches at his former employer, he added:
"It's nothing new. The government has always lied about so many
things. Look at the Downing Street Memo, for example, the document
confirming that the Bush administration lied to us about its motives
for getting into the war.
" If they lied to us about this, what else? Well, 9/11 is just
another example."
To add more fuel to the hot 9/11 controversy, William Rodriguez, the
WTC janitor who heard and felt a strong explosion in the basement
levels of the north tower just seconds before the jetliner crashed into
the top floors, recently came forward to tell his story, adding further
credibility to Reynolds' conclusions.
Rodriguez claims a massive underground explosion brought down the
towers. His story is strengthened further by 14 other eye witnesses who
can verify his claims, as well as a burn victim from the basement
explosion who he helped to safety.
Immediately following 9/11, Rodriguez tried to tell his story, but
claims the 9/11 Commission and the mainstream media have systematically
censored his words in order to protect the official government story, a
story ignoring the possibility of explosives being used to bring down
the WTC.
Commenting on Rodriguez, Reynolds said:
"It's not a coincidence that there was first an explosion below
and then the jetliner explosion seconds later above. At least there
should have been a thorough investigation since the timing of the
explosions strikes me as an impossibility if you believe, as the
government contends, that only a jetliner brought down the towers."
Reynolds added that nobody from the Bush administration has officially
contacted him about his statements suggesting 9/11 was an "inside job,"
but said he was aware that "administration operatives" have carried his
message into the halls of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
"How high up it went, I just don't know," he added.
Asked if he was going to continue to research and write about 9/11,
Reynolds said:
"Yes, of course, I see it as a citizen's duty and I hope to do
some more writing on the subject very soon."